Share Page:

Volume 15 , Issue 4
July/August 2000

Pages 545549

Cement Failure Loads of 4 Provisional Luting Agents Used for the Cementation of Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures

Konstantinos X. Michalakis, DDS, PhD candidate, Argiris L. Pissiotis, DMD, MS, PhD, Hiroshi Hirayama, DDS, DMD, MS, FACP

PMID: 10960988

The major disadvantage of cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) is difficulty in retrievability. The retentive strengths of the provisional luting agents usually employed in these cases are therefore an important consideration. This study evaluated the cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of FPDs supported by 2 implants or 4 implants. Nogenol luting agent exhibited the lowest retentive values in both types of FPD. ImProv proved to be the most retentive cement of all tested. Temp Bond NE and Temp Bond presented significantly different values (P < .05) for the 2-implant FPD, but not for the 4-implant model. On the basis of the study results, it may be concluded that Nogenol appears to be more appropriate for cementation of both 2- and 4-implant-supported FPDs when removal of the provisionally cemented superstructure is anticipated. (INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2000;15:545549) Key words: dental cements, denture retention, implant-supported dental prosthesis

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.


© 2020 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Author Guidelines
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us