LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 36 , Issue 4
July/August 2021

Pages 762770


Influence of Clinical Parameters on the Primary Stability of a Tapered Dental Implant: A Retrospective Analysis

Oliver Blume, MD, DDS/Jan Wildenhof, DDS/Sven Otto, MD, DDS/Florian A. Probst, MD, DDS


PMID: 34411218
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.8682

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of different clinical parameters on the primary stability of a variable thread tapered implant system with a focus on surgical undersizing protocols. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients who received NobelActive implants in a single institution. The relationship between the independent variables, bone quality, implant diameter, implant length, implantation time, region of the jaw, and surgical undersizing protocol, and the dependent variable, maximum insertion torque, was investigated. Statistical analysis was conducted using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple linear regression. Results: A total of 1,292 implants placed in 574 fully or partially edentulous patients were evaluated. For the total sample size, without further differentiation between bone qualities, statistically significantly higher primary stability values were shown for an 8% to 9% undersized group (50.33 17.16 Ncm), compared with a 16% undersized group (41.88 17.63 Ncm), a 20% undersized group (33.65 15.78 Ncm), a 26% to 28% undersized group (34.53 15.49 Ncm), and a 35% to 44% undersized group (32.78 18.80 Ncm). No statistical differences were found for undersizing protocols in bone quality 4. Bone quality had the highest influence on primary stability (Welch-Test F(3, 65.57) = 119.48, P < .001, η2 = .20). Contrary to the other investigated independent variables, no statistically significant differences in primary stability were found for the different implantation times. Conclusion: Undersizing protocols exceeding 8% to 9% do not seem to enhance primary stability values. Further studies are needed to investigate the biologic consequences of undersizing, including the impact of implant design characteristics.


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2022 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help