Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Journal of Craniomandibular Function
EJED Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Author Guidelines
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
Official Site
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: CMF

 

Journal of Craniomandibular Function

Editor in Chief: Prof. Dr. Alfons Hugger

Official publication of the German Society of Craniomandibular Function and Disorders

ISSN 1868-4149

Publication:

Fall 2021
Volume 13 , Issue 3

Back
Share Abstract:

Centric relation, maximal intercuspal position, and their practical implications

Karl-Heinz Utz, Walter Lückerath, Peter Schwarting, Wolfgang Noethlichs, Ralph Büttner, Manfred Grüner, Edgar Fuß, Helmut Stark



Pages: 185–202

Aim: The goal of the present study was to determine both distances and spatial relationships between centric relation (CR) and maximal intercuspal position (MIP) in the condylar area, and to demonstrate their implications for dental practice. Materials and methods: Eighty-one subjects were assigned to one of four licensed dentists, who recorded their CR by six different checkbite registration methods. Maxillary casts were mounted after transferring the individual hinge axes to Dentatus articulators by facebow transfer, and mandibular casts were mounted in precise alignment with the apex of a Gothic arch tracing. A fifth colleague took measurements in the condylar area after transferring the casts to a special measuring articulator. Distances and spatial relationships were calculated as the means of triplicate measurements with casts mounted in CR and of duplicate measurements with casts articulated in MIP for each bite registration method. Results: Overall, the spatial mean distance between CR and MIP for all methods combined was 0.86 ± 0.52 mm (min 0.05 mm; max 3.14 mm). The corresponding mean distance was 0.47 mm on the purely sagittal plane. The mean position of the condyles in CR was only slightly dorsal and cranial to that in MIP but with considerable variation in all spatial directions. Conclusions: MIP moves the condyles out of CR to a position that deviates from CR by an average of 0.8 to 0.9 mm spatially and by approximately 0.5 mm on the sagittal plane, with slightly anterior and caudal deviation as well. Hence, the spatial position of the condyles in MIP varies considerably from that in CR. This has substantial implications for dental practice, eg, when performing terminal molar tooth preparation or interpreting condylar position indicator device readings.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
  © 2021 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog